![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Engine Management (EFI) Stand-alone solutions for your Roadster! Questions, answers, and tech-talk! |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 122
|
Hey Guys
question thats been on my mind for a while now for ITBS why do a majority of users use throttle position sensor and map sensor? I was always led to believe with ITBs you just map it up on the tps and it was pretty much a done game is there any particular reason for using both? Just on my previous 106 gti I was running ITBs which was mapped on tps only idle was fine driving was fine everything pretty much normal, it's just I want to make the right decision as to which ms to get for my build. thanks |
|
__________________
hear it, smell it, touch it, taste it, see it, live it |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,430
|
Streetability.
On a dedicated track car you could just use an alpha-n setup like you speak of and be fine. On the street a blend of that and speed density is ideal for low-RPM performance and mid to high-end power that you don't see on the track. It's taken me a few years of tinkering with my tune to finally get it working the way I want it to at low RPMs. I tried making an alpha-n map for my car but it just wasn't as streetable as it was on a speed density map. I swap it over every now and again when I feel like driving the piss out of the car, but I wouldn't want it to behave like that every day going to and from work. |
|
__________________
What has this become... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
hear it, smell it, touch it, taste it, see it, live it |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|